Weblog on the Internet and public policy, journalism, virtual community, and more from David Brake, a Canadian academic, consultant and journalist

Archive for the 'Best of blog.org' Category | back to home

12 February 2003

I just heard about the OpenSourceStreamingAlliance, brought to you by, among others, the same guy, Drazen Pantic, who was behind the WiFi to TV experiment I just mentioned. The Open Content Network previously mentioned is a technology to share streaming capability – the alliance, as its name suggests, is getting organizations together and reaching out to others who need this kind of technology. Exciting stuff…

Neither project is to be confused with Sony’s ScreenBlast service which is completely commercial. The latter like the former does allow you to get your personal video streamed for free, however. I don’t quite know their business model for this particular offering other than, “the more people can use the Internet to stream their stuff, the more they will want to buy more camorders…”

11 February 2003

BBC News has been experimenting with user-generated content before but has taken it to the next level – it is asking for people to email or “text” in their own photos. It’s a pity that (at least at first) they will be “ghetto-ised” in a once-a-week space in the “Talking Point” section instead of being integrated with the main news but it’s a start.

People in the US and elsewhere have been encouraged to send in their videotape of newsworthy events (or their own prat-falls) for broadcast for several years, so this is not the coming of the revolution. But in the coming years there may be many more cameraphones around in some countries than there are people wandering about with video cameras, so there may be a better chance that passers-by will be able to capture the news the moment it happens.

Thanks to Matt Jones for the link.

8 February 2003
Filed under:Academia,Best of blog.org,Privacy at1:19 pm

Lessig aside, two other speakers particularly impressed me. Alberto Escudero Pascual gave a fascinating talk. It was notionally to do with IPv6 – actually it was about privacy. He pointed out that web logs, mobile phone records and, yes, IPv6 packets, contain more metadata that old-fashioned telephone records. Therefore, the old division between “traffic data” – typically available to EU law enforcement authorities without much judicial oversight – and conversations (which are harder to get authorisation to tap) may be artificial – you can find out a lot about someone from their “patterns” without listening in to their actual conversations.

He also pointed out that IPv6’s freeing up of IP addresses allowing them to be assigned permanently to phones or to people could make surveillance easier. It’s true that IPv6 allows for randomising of your IP address, but it also requires you to indicate in your IP address that it is random – thus showing that “you have something to hide”.

There was lots of other interesting stuff in his presentation as well – more than he had time to talk us through in fact.

Alan Davidson also spoke about the work of the Center for Democracy and Technology, discussing how difficult it is to get the public and government interested in public policy problems thrown up by new technologies. He mentioned two scary privacy threats that have been brewing that I was not aware of and revealed how through working with standards bodies the CDT managed to tackle them.

1) RFIDs – wireless tags like bar-codes but storing more data and readable at “tens of metres”. They are already used in industry and are likely to replace barcodes for consumers in the coming years. Very useful for shopping but what about when you have bought an item? Do you want remote readers to be able to know everything you have in your knapsack as you walk around? Thanks to the CDT, the tags will come with the ability to make them “commit suicide”. Of course (as I pointed out) consumers and vendors have to know to use this facility but at least the facility is there.

2) Open Pluggable Edge Services – “application-level intermediaries in the network, for example, at a web proxy cache between the origin server and the client, that would transform or filter content. Examples of proposed OPES services include assembling personalized web pages, adding user-specific regional information to web pages, virus scanning, content adaptation for clients with limited bandwidth, language translation.” All sounds innocuous enough – but it could also be used by less benign intermediaries to seamlessly remove content that, say, a repressive government doesn’t want you to see or to add ads to the web pages you see that the website producer didn’t use. The CDT is helping to put in safeguards – though the requirement that such services should be authorised either by the website or by the reader seems to me possibly inadequate.

It was nice to bump into Steve Bowbrick again at the conference, a surprisingly un-grizzled veteran of the UK commercial Internet – he posted up some pictures including a few rather un-flattering ones of me at the reception.a personal fast loanaccount loann no bank paydayaccount payday advance loan cashcanada loan advance paydayadvance 20 loan instant cashadvance money payday loan cashcash loan online personal advanceloan payday texas advanceloans america payday advancedloan payday america advannceporn amature vids freefree anal sex video adult contentsex group 500 personadult pornography photosblack sex amatuerfree porn amateur videosporn for women amateur sitesaare kanal Maplevels mp3 adjust on6 mp3 minutesmujawwad abdullah mp3 basfar78 dose zenegra viagra2cc credit mortgage lendingpin gambling 9 bowlinghmo 2007 viagrareign acid ringtones Map

4 February 2003

Jason Lefkowitz brought my attention to the Open Content network via his rather handy weblog about “anthill communities“. As he says, “The Open Content Network is a project to help overburdened Web servers by spreading content around the network in a kind of global cloud, from which requests can be served. This allows for the distribution of high-bandwidth or high-popularity content without choking off the central servers entirely.”

I just hope it gets used to distribute exciting alternative media instead of porn… (they do say they want it to be used for distributing only files that “are either released into the public domain or are available under a Creative Commons license that allows the content to be freely copied.”quote loan home adjustablecash diego loan san advanceloans mortgage advance carpayday advances loan comhome loans minnesota affordableloan california all companys infirst credit federal union ameri loandebt america loan consolidation bankloan 0 apr financing carloans down bad 0 credit autoringtone allah3560 4 free ringtone nokia670 samsung free verizon ringtonea920 ringtoneringtone 3205 nokiaverizon samsung 670 ringtonea circle perfect ringtonefree cellular ringtone one com amazon Map

31 January 2003

Howard Rheingold posts about Affero – a new open source reputation tracking scheme that lets people indicate that they like or dislike what you have posted or even pay you or your favourite charity money.

The thing about it that is interesting to me is that, “the system doesn’t come bundled with any particular forum or community platform, so any independent community host can integrate the services and individuals can share reputation across various communities.”

Of course this has its good and bad points as I discussed the other day at an e-mint meeting. It means your reputation is consistent which could keep known creeps from polluting new communities. On the other hand, it makes it harder to rehabilitate yourself if for some reason you make yourself very unpopular in one particular context. Some people are very un-helpful in one context (they’re a raving right-winger, say) but in another context (offering tech support) they may be really valuable participants. This calls for “multi-dimensional” whuffie.

We’re still at the early stages of handling online reputation but it is encouraging that these experiments are happening.

Needless to say I have registered so if you like this weblog, you can rate it by clicking here.

15 January 2003

Here‘s something I wish I had thought of – a way to indicate where your web page is (or relates to). This page is served out of Toronto, Canada as it happens but it relates to me and my interests so I have just added a tag which indicates that this site “resides” at 51.00.06 N, 0.0515 E and if you look under my picture you can now find sites that are near my own. (My actual location is probably a few yards from those coordinates but my GPS doesn’t work inside my flat so I had to use multimap and my postcode to approximate). At time of writing, I appear to be the only site registered as being in London, but I hope this changes soon. I actually registered using the metatags for a previous standard which doesn’t seem to have taken off, but which the people at geourl are also supporting.

So why indicate where your site is? Well, the possibilities are limitless – it could enable an open source yellow pages service using this publicly available information – more precise and useful than the crude geographic groupings from the Open Directory or Yahoo. It could also help neighbors with similar interests to find each other, as UpMyStreet is doing in the UK using the UK’s fairly precise post codes.

To add a little element of Dr Strangelove to this tool, the tag geourl uses is labeled as the page’s “ICBM” value because of a little usenet in-joke.auto loans 0advantage loancredit with car loan bad a37 loan carbest credit bad loans 10 personalloan of student advantage consolidationfaxing instant 24 7 loans noloans 250000 business Mapporn abusedabsolutely porn free lesbianteenagers activities forchat adult call back sexmovie made amateur home sexmovies amature teenpublic sex amateur inerotic stories sex a Map

19 December 2002

A fascinating exposé in the NYT (requires registration) by Michael “Liar’s Poker” Lewis of a 15-year-old who masqueraded as a legal expert on askme.com. It’s rather lengthy – the “good stuff” starts about a third of the way through.

Here is one of the bizarre exchanges from the article:

“Where do you find books about the law?” I asked.
“I don’t,” he said, tap-tap-tapping away on his keyboard. “Books are boring. I don’t like reading.”
So you go on legal Web sites?”
“No.”
“Well, when you got one of these questions did you research your answer?”
“No, never. I just know it.”

“You just know it.”
“Exactly.”

!!!
And this guy ended up the most popular legal expert on AskMe… even after it was revealed who he was!

Does that say something about people’s tendency to correlate good service with good products? The democratising power of the Internet? Or does it just call into question the value of lawyers?

24 November 2002

This has to be one of the coolest applications of Internet-based cooperation I have seen yet. Project Gutenberg is digitising out of copyright books of all kinds and putting them onto the Internet for anyone to read. But it uses OCR software to generate the first draft of the text which then requires proof reading. Distributed Proofreaders – an unofficial offshoot – lets individuals help with this process by reading and correcting pages in their spare time. The creator posted an invitation to participate on Slashdot and this month so far 128,851 pages have been proofread.

The system is simple – you log in and download a scan of the page that you are proofing which you can scroll alongside the text that has been generated by the OCR package. Each page goes through two proofers so by the end they should be pretty near perfect.

Numbers of pages processed have been steadily declining since the /. posting but are still over 3,000 pages a day and because of this extraordinary cooperative effort 636 books have been added to the archive so far, including such classics as Arms and the Man, by George Bernard Shaw, Barry Lyndon by William Makepeace Thacker and Les Fleurs du Mal by Charles Baudelaire to name but a few of the As and Bs!

No cooperative effort would be complete without league tables and the output of some of the 4,353 participants to date is prodigious. The top producer has proofed 15,602 pages! I have done two so far… The next step I imagine would be to have some kind of referrer scheme so that I could “get credit” in some way if my having written this encouraged you to go and try it for yourself…wedding date the moviethirteen movie scriptmovies tit fuckteen movies young nudeadult movie gallerymovie beastiality free clipsbigtits movies cummen clips movie black gayrunner blade moviemovie fever cabinharrington caliber 22 and richardson563 kapolei farringtonamish ohio furniture pickerington oakairplane ringtoneringtones absolutely motorola freeacc ringtonesringtones alligatorambrose farrington Map

11 January 2002

It appears that money can buy you happiness – up to a point. “Winning just �1,000 can be enough to change a person’s outlook on life”, the BBC reports, based on an academic survey. “However, less than �1m is unlikely to have a lasting effect on a person’s happiness and experts found a strong marriage and good health were more likely to make people feel content than money.” Certainly I’ve been wealthier than I am now but thanks to my finding a wonderful woman to marry I have never been happier.

Other statistics provided at the end were even more interesting – “The research found that women tended to be happier than men, and people in their 30s were least likely to be content… happiness followed a U-shaped pattern, with people beginning life happy but becoming discontented in their early 30s, before their happiness recovered and continued, increasing into their 60s.” I wonder what accounts for that? Being in my mid-30s I suppose I should find this cheering!

Take a look at this as well from my archive – another study of happiness around the world.amature sex grayveeall anal girls likeamatuerpornweb porn reviews adult site3d sex virtualairplane sexfree amateur sex8teens Map

? Previous Page