Weblog on the Internet and public policy, journalism, virtual community, and more from David Brake, a Canadian academic, consultant and journalist
22 November 2001
Filed under:Uncategorized at2:17 am

Fouad Ajami, a writer for the New York Times, takes a detailed look at the news coverage of Al Jazeera (registration required). He concludes that it is biased against the US and that instead of responding to it the American government should concentrate on giving interviews to the “less inflammatory” Arab TV stations (which also, it appears, have more viewers). Admittedly, the way the news is presented in the segments the author highlights doesn’t seem too fair, but much of the West’s TV has not always been even-handed either, and it is unfair to mix description of the “straight news” segments with the “talk radio”-style programming.

Whatever you think of Al Jazeera, in my view only agreeing to talk to the “official” Arab news stations which the author himself admits are “pompous” and “sycophantic” can hardly be the answer.

For a shorter but more involving take on the same subject, listen from about 7 minutes in to this excellent recent This American Life episode – Rashomon. A Palestinian teenager living in Chicago gets most of her news from Al Jazeera and other Arab broadcasters – unsurprisingly, her world view is a little different from the average American’s.

1 Comment

  1. i am doing a research paper on whether arab stations could serve as real substitutes to western media giants. Kindly, please write back to me on my email address and tell me what you feel about this. I’d be very grateful to you.

    Comment by bia — 23 December 2003 @ 11:41 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.